There are posts celebrating schooling in villages. My heart aches. Schooling every potter and weaver and farmers away from their vast traditions is a defeat and no victory.
It is the indicator of the destructions of diverse learnings and strengths and existances. And the establishment of the monopoly of the Schooled.
When a farmer, an adivasi deeply learned in the lore of the forests, desires his children to learn reading, writing and go to colleges and start anew in the other world, losing every vast inherited wisdom and starting anew as a first generation learner - then I see the utter defeat of my dreams, and the end of my imaginings.
Subramani Reddy
That is the deepest damage that is being done today.
In the name of making your life better through 'education' which they think is possible only in the schools where they control.
Forests and villages and elders who help their children understand how to lead a harmonious and balanced simple life with nature is considered no education.
What else can be more painful than this.
Villages need livlihoods. Not schools.
That schools create livlihoods is the biggest hoax perpetrated on villages.
The village children lose their traditional calling, farming or weaving. They lose the skill, and also all respect for that skill.
The village children also find no space in the white collar world. Posited against privileged children whose very inheritance is that learning, supported by vastly superior schools.
The children are a sacrifice to the holy cow called schooling.
Welcome to my village.
Schools schools urban youth to look down on village youth.
Schools school village youth into look down on themselves.
All schools, alternative, mainstream, green or blue or red.
To proponents to Schooling for All. To all those on the mission of setting up schools in every remote village.
Today my village is full of schooled unemployed. Who also did not master traditional skills as they we busy being schooled.
Is it realistic for a country to aim at tertiary level livlihoods for all ? And none at the primary, secondary levels ?
Or to strengthen the primary and secondary livlihoods and create a parity in value of all livlihoods ?
If my children could all get good nourishment, if their parents all had rural livlihoods, I would seek no more.
They do not need schools. They are having a far more rounded education with crops and cattle and sustainable skills, and elders in a community passing down wisdom and knowlege.
They learn nurturing from older children, and all the adults in the community. They learn by nurturing smaller children. They learn that life move in co-operation and camaraderie, not in competition, and self promotion.
They can educate the world, were the world open to listening. They can teach the world how to save itself from certian apocalypse today.
A story ...
There was a wise and wonderful community in rural India.
The educated, decided to 'develop' them and give them the basics of health and education.
They were given an allopathic system, which invalidated, before their own eyes, their vast and detailed health practice.
They were given a schooling system which proclaimed and established the supremacy of a certian type of learning - based on reading and writing skills - and rendered worthless before their own eyes their vast and deep knowlege of animals and plants and farming and animal rearing and cures and stories and dances.
A wise and wonderful community lost its sense of worth and value and thereby lost everything.
... When 'the modern-educated', engage with the village people 'the traditionally wise', if we are not aware of their own paradigms, we will only impoverish them.
... It takes long years in a community, to even begin to understand their wisdom and worldview.
Modern education is leaving whole swathes of rural children unemployable and frustrated. It is a curse.
More and better schools is no answer.
"Schooling for all is the answer", they tell me.
What is the question that this answers ?
We need the larger picture of how we want to world to be, and how we want the country to be. The ethics, and the economic framework, and the sustainablility. Into this understanding we design and weave in schooling. If we do that, I suspect it will be very different from what we consider as a school.
Instead there is a 'schooling for all'. There are some debates on the content. And there is a generation of rural children schooled, degreed, and unemployed. There is a generation of upper class children schooled in modern sciences that in final analysis will only serve to strip the earth more and more.
This is why this parody called schooling has to be exposed. There can never be any attempt towards levelling through this process of schooling - the inequities will only widen, as the facilities offered to differing sections are worlds apart, and getting farther apart with the day. There are children in Bada Amda and in my village, and other children going to designer schools in Delhi and Bombay.
Unless we can establish local livlihoods, and local sustainable skills and local economies the war is lost. We will anyway engage in small battles as it allows us to sleep at night with conscience lulled. ... and so i have taught my village children for the last two decades ...
Children have always learnt, and are always learning - whats new. We've put up buildings called schools and say what happens there is learning.
Subtly invalidation all other learning.
In actuality schools only reinforce our power, because our knowlege system is treated as the only valid one by the 'school'.
The skilled farmer and potter and thatcher also buy our message, and feel invalidated.
Comments
Aparna Krishnan A friend objected severely and said that if i dont work to change schools with the passion i try to show, she cannot take me seriously !
Well, it does not matter - i stopped taking myself seriously long long ago. And I dont want to 'change schools'. i want to 'outlaw schools'. But unable to do that, i teach my children and tell them to 'get marks', and help them forget thair vast inherited skills, and become 'nurses' or 'clerks'.
Along with outlawing schools, one needs to build up a society that validates and values all skills equally - the potter's the thatcher's ... And that is the main and only challenge before us. Schools and schooling is neither here nor there,
Schools are the greatest homogenizing weapon. The way to enter communities and invalidate all knowledge except what is promoted within the walls of the school.
Every village. Every tribal hamlet. Every kind of school.
Alternative schools accomodate a little bit of the village s own learnings within the walls. Which while seeming better. Actually only underlines that validation happens only when the school accepts it.
A school is structured to lay waste the identities of communities, their self respect, their integrity. And reinforce the dominant system. In complete ways.
Been there, seen that, seeing that ...
Schooling works against the innate strengths of every village child anchored in a million traditions and skills. Skills far vaster than any that schooling can offer.
Schooling invalidates all of them. The skills. And the children.
The only worthwhile part of village schools is midday meals.
Otherwise its a process of deskilling, deracinating and rendering useless children coming from a hoary heritage of sustainable skills. Farming, pottery, weaving.
And tossing them into a dead end.
The day a village child measures itself by its low marks
... that child which can climb every tree, ford every stream, milk every cow, treat every illness of the cow, who knows every plant around for its medicinal and food value ...
... that day we the Educated have conquered the village and the village child.
And there is the the retarding effect of school which is more visible with every passing generation (at the least the personalities are disjointed, with some scholastic ability but little perspective or empathy, just like the subjects they learn which are as artificially disjointed).
But more worrying is the hegemonising effect of schools where wise and learned village communities become 'iiliterate', second division holders, and suddenly and cruelly inferior to the literate community. The complete negation that schooling does to the potter and the thatcher and the vaidya in our village is a crime vaster than any.
But unable to beat this system, we also school our children, and goad them to do 'well in board exams'.
I hate schools. In a cold and dispassionate manner.
Eashwaramma called me up now to ask if I had spoken to Sasi thro' the headmaster. That she day she dropped him there in the residential school, that evening he called up and wept and said he could not cope with the English medium and to please bring him back. I told her I had not called the headmaster again, and that he would settle down, and to not worry. And all my own worries, carefully supressed came to the fore again.
Children of a farming community, rich in knowlege of herbs, and care of cows, and in climbing trees, and in making catapults. Children who co-operate and share, and help the slowest to run faster, and never think of personal aggrandisation over community well being.
Such children are placed in schools, and judged on the single yardstick of their literacy and book skills. They fail. Sasi, multi talented, will simply be made into a medicre or slow student. And become one of the peons or clerks for us the rich and beautiful.
No comments:
Post a Comment